Confessions for Revival

When I was still involved in my church, we were always preparing for a revival.  An elder, also an engineer, had read enough about revivals to feel he had figured out the formula.  Here is the simplistic version:

Prayer + Public confessions of sins = Outpouring of the Holy Spirit (as evidenced by healings, restored relationships, and hundreds of new believers joining the church)

He was sure that we’d had enough years of prayer.  Since we were on the third generation of The Move, that gave us about 60 years worth.

It was time for confession of sins.

Easily guilted, I volunteered to confess to the congregation a horrible, secret sin.  I called it “intellectual arrogance” which sounded absolutely horrible.  In reality, what I meant was not that I was conceited about my cognitive abilities, but that I

1) wanted people to think I was smart (I like smart people, I wanted them to like me)

2) wanted to understand things and didn’t like being told that I should accept contradictory, irrational or immoral things because I wasn’t capable of understanding ‘god’s mysterious ways

3) sometimes didn’t do things because I was afraid of failing

When explaining the depths of my sin, I didn’t use these exact words since we were never allowed to use the word immoral in reference to god.  I doubt anyone heard anything after the phrase ‘intellectual arrogance’ since I knew an entire row of people had expressed their belief that higher education makes people arrogant and stupid.

I do regret it now.  Not because I could easily be labeled as conceited, but because I may have discouraged people from thinking.  A friend who was studying for his doctorate in English whispered to me that I had apologized for ‘sins’ that he ‘struggled’ with.  What would all of the teenagers and kids think to hear thinking confessed as a sin?  Probably the same things I thought when I heard it, as our flawed human mind was a common topic for promoting blind faith.

The first part of my sin, wanting people to think I was smart, I can now laugh at.  How many people would confess to the sin of wearing mascara because they wanted their eyes to appear larger?  Or how many people wash with scented soap because they want people to think they smell nice?  Its ok.

The second part angers me.  I let myself be manipulated into feeling bad for wanting to understand something.  I forgive myself.  I was brought up hearing this, as were the ones who preached it.

I now see that the third part of my confession had nothing to do with wanting to understand things, but actually kept me from trying to discover things.

To rephrase: I profess to having that wonderful human trait of curiosity, morals and common sense; I profess to liking smart people and wanting to be smart; and I admit to being afraid to fail but willing to anyways.

According to the formula, we need a few more confessions before a revival can start.  hint, hint

 

3 thoughts on “Confessions for Revival

  1. David says:

    be proud to be intelligent and curious. it would make you a whole lot less interesting if you weren’t. religion dulls the senses. it makes blind faith a virtue and skepticism a vice, when the exact opposite is actually true. not being shackled by religion frees you to be uniquely you, instead of just another automaton.

    as for feeling bad about having confessed this “sin”, that’s understandable, but don’t dwell on it. what’s past is past. just learn from it and move on.

    have a nice day.

    • prairienymph says:

      So true. I hear stories about my M-i-l’s younger days. She sounded so fascinating. Her life was organizing canoe trips, painting & music, studying biology, and then farming – a true back-to-the-lander. Many of her pictures show her in bathing suits or self-made belly baring halter tops. Now she tells us she just can’t accept or understand evolution (after studying biology in university for years?), and gives me a talking when I show a bare shoulder of facebook. She grew up in a more mainline church but is now a devoted evangelical. I think she was more interesting before.

  2. David says:

    Can’t or won’t understand evolution? There’s a huge difference, and I find the latter is far more often the case. They wouldn’t let a silly thing like observable, demonstrable fact get in the way of blissful, blind belief.

    Of course she was more interesting before. The deeply religious are always such bores.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s